<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harry Potter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sleepyhead.org/archives/2005/12/24/harry-potter-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sleepyhead.org/archives/2005/12/24/harry-potter-2/</link>
	<description>more fun than sleeping!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Palladian</title>
		<link>http://sleepyhead.org/archives/2005/12/24/harry-potter-2/#comment-1009</link>
		<dc:creator>Palladian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2005 04:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sleepyhead.org/archives/2005/12/24/harry-potter-2/#comment-1009</guid>
		<description>I think Narnia is very stiff competition, both the book and the movie (I hear), for the Potter franchise. Perhaps in comparison, people realize that you can have the magic, exploration and wonder (and darkness!) plus philosophical depth all in the same movie geared towards younger people. I've never thought the Potter movies were especially strong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Narnia is very stiff competition, both the book and the movie (I hear), for the Potter franchise. Perhaps in comparison, people realize that you can have the magic, exploration and wonder (and darkness!) plus philosophical depth all in the same movie geared towards younger people. I&#8217;ve never thought the Potter movies were especially strong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
