Obama proposes cutting oil and gas subsidies to fund jobs plan
HOLY SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yes! I do not agree with oil and gas subsidies and I would like a job in the field I went to a university to work in. Gobama!
(Source: sustainable-sam)
HOLY SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yes! I do not agree with oil and gas subsidies and I would like a job in the field I went to a university to work in. Gobama!
(Source: sustainable-sam)
This is so annoying. I’m always pretty close also, and would happily pay more for a higher tier. I understand bandwidth is not free, but nope, not allowed.
On June 16, the House of Representatives passed its $125.5 billion agriculture plan for 2012. Deep in the bill’s fine print was the elimination of funding for the $4.5 million Microbiological Data Program, which tests vegetables for such diseases as the lethal E. coli strain that’s killed 50 people in western Europe.
The MDP was started in 2001 to help fill gaps in federal and industry safety testing of produce, which has historically received less attention than meat and dairy products.
Run by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the program’s agents test some 15,000 market-purchased samples of foreign and domestic alfalfa, spinach, lettuce, cilantro, cherry and plum tomatoes. Results are sent to the Food and Drug Administration, which by comparison tests just 1,000 produce samples in its non-annual surveys.
Moreover, as noted by the Chicago Tribune and food outbreak litigator Bill Marler, the FDA only tests for one pathogenic E. coli strain. The Microbiological Data Program looks for many, including as the virulent new European strain.
According to the FDA, MDP results have led to 19 food recalls in the last two years. But as detailed in notes from a February meeting of the USDA’s Fruit and Vegetable Industry Advisory Committee, the agriculture industry doesn’t like the MDP. They say it creates unnecessary product recalls and damages farmers’ reputations.
Emphasis mine.
depressing…
Translated to the digital realm, the diplomatic example captures the notion that citizens have the right to communicate both with one another and, in a cloud environment, with their own remote selves, full stop. No party, public or private, should have the unchecked ability to abridge an individual’s lines of communication over our generic global Internet./via Net Neutrality as Diplomacy | Yale Law and Policy Review. This seems like a good new way to frame the debate. I wouldn’t go with diplomacy though as much as human rights. You are cutting people off from their own data, and parts of themselves. Diplomats are people that we think of as being special, but we all have autonomy and liberty, right?